Insight

How Plynth reviews planning sources for its articles

Plynth's source-maintenance method for separating source identity, currency basis, checked date, change triggers and dependent-page review.

Editorial source records and manual article dependency review; this does not claim that every external change is detected instantaneously.

A source's checked date tells you when it was inspected, not when its rules began or whether it has changed since. Plynth's editorial source registry keeps those dates separate and helps an editor find registered articles that may need review after a source change.

What the source record tells you

Each registered source receives a stable ID, canonical publisher URL, jurisdiction, type, status and change triggers. An article references that ID rather than copying an unconnected source note. Once an editor verifies a source change and selects its registry ID, the dependency lookup lists the registered pages that reference it for factual review.

Use the NSW legislation collection to locate applicable environmental planning instruments. The NSW Planning Portal Spatial Viewer helps locate available planning layers; check the map adopted by the applicable instrument. The Portal terms warn that spatial updates can lag official maps.

Original Plynth evidence

Source currency and dependency ledger

A Plynth-authored model showing the separate facts required to make a freshness claim reviewable.

FieldQuestion it answersExample evidenceIt must not imply
Source IDWhich source is this across pages and versions?Stable registry keyThat the source is current
Canonical URLWhere can the publisher's source be inspected?NSW legislation or Planning Portal URLEndorsement of Plynth
Effective date / vintageWhen did this version or dataset apply?Instrument commencement or dataset reference dateWhen Plynth checked it
Checked dateWhen did Plynth last inspect the source record?Verification timestamp and receiptThat no later change exists
Change triggerWhat event requires dependent content review?Amendment, repeal, map replacement or dataset releaseInstantaneous detection
Dependent pagesWhich conclusions could be affected?Registered article pathsThat every page conclusion changed
Check stateHas the impact been assessed?Pending, checked or revisedAutomatic factual approval

Effective date is not modified date

An instrument's effective date describes when its provisions apply. A page's dateModified describes a substantive public revision to that page. A source checkedAt date records an inspection event. Advancing all three during a deployment would create a false freshness signal.

Change propagation

  1. Detect or receive a source-change signal.
  2. Verify the publisher, source identity and actual changed provision or data.
  3. List dependent pages from the shared registry.
  4. Identify affected claims within those pages.
  5. Revise only conclusions that the change materially affects.
  6. Update public modified/review dates only after that substantive review.

Limitations and failure modes

  • A publisher can change a document or endpoint without a reliable machine notification.
  • A consolidated current instrument can differ from the version applicable to an older application.
  • Spatial datasets, written provisions and supporting guidance can update on different schedules.
  • A source change can be immaterial to a page, but that decision still needs to be recorded.
  • Repository-backed content requires a reviewed build and deployment before a new article can appear publicly.

Next questions

See how a planning answer connects to its source for the evidence and applicability questions to check beside a conclusion.

Change record

What would trigger a recheck

  • Plynth changes its source registry, change-detection or content-review method
  • A referenced official publication mechanism materially changes
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Publication status
published
Most recent source check
8 November 2026